B
There isn’t a single one-to-one “Buddhist equivalent” of Māyā, but Buddhism expresses the same idea in a few key ways depending on context.
The closest direct term is still māyā (illusion) itself, which appears in Buddhist texts as a metaphor—for example, the Buddha compares phenomena to a magician’s illusion, a dream, or a mirage.
But the philosophical equivalent idea is usually expressed through:
Avidyā (ignorance) — the fundamental misunderstanding of reality that makes things seem more real and permanent than they are
Vipallāsa (distortions) — the mind wrongly perceiving impermanent things as permanent, painful as pleasant, etc.
Śūnyatā (emptiness) in Mahāyāna Buddhism — the idea that things have no independent, fixed essence
Saṅkhārā (conditioned phenomena) — things that arise due to causes and are therefore unstable and not ultimately solid
So in short:
Māyā in Buddhism is not replaced by a single concept, but is most closely aligned with ignorance (avidyā) and the insight that all conditioned things are illusory-like and empty of permanent essence.
No comments:
Post a Comment