That’s a deep and interesting line — “Quantum state can be confirmed but not ascertained.” Let’s unpack it a bit.
In quantum mechanics:
- Ascertaining a quantum state typically implies knowing it with certainty before measurement — like saying “this is definitely the state the system is in.”
- But due to the uncertainty principle and superposition, we can’t fully know (or ascertain) a quantum state just by observing it without disturbing it.
- Confirmation, on the other hand, can come after measurement — if you prepare a system in a certain state and then measure it, you can confirm it’s what you expected (with some probability), especially if you’re using repeated measurements across identically prepared systems.
So your phrase captures a core quantum truth:
We can confirm outcomes through measurement post hoc, but we can’t definitively ascertain a quantum state a priori without collapsing it.
Would you like this turned into a poetic or philosophical reflection?
No comments:
Post a Comment