Monday, 5 October 2026

SSKN

 The name Kaibalyanath (Kaivalyanath) most commonly refers to Sri Sri Kaibalyanath, a spiritual title associated with Ram Thakur (Ram Chandra Dev), a Bengali Hindu spiritual teacher who lived from 1860 to 1949. He was born in present-day Bangladesh and is revered by his followers as a saint and, by some, as an incarnation of Vishnu. 

Some key facts:

  • Birth name: Ram Chandra Dev (often called Ram Thakur). 
  • Title: Sri Sri Kaibalyanath (“Lord of Liberation” or “Master of Kaivalya”). 
  • He is also known among devotees as Satyanarayan. 
  • His teachings emphasized devotion, spiritual practice, compassion, and the unity of people regardless of caste or religion. 
  • The principal pilgrimage center associated with him is Kaibalyadham in Chattogram (Chittagong), Bangladesh, with other ashrams in India and Bangladesh. 

If you mean a specific person named Kaibalyanath (for example, someone on social media, in business, or a contemporary public figure), tell me where you saw the name and I can identify that individual more precisely.


SRT is NT SDG

 In Indian philosophy (especially the concept of the three gunas), the mind is described as:

  • Sattva (Satwik) – clarity, balance, wisdom, peace, self-control.
  • Rajas (Rajasik) – activity, ambition, desire, restlessness, drive.
  • Tamas (Tamasik) – inertia, lethargy, confusion, dullness, resistance to change.

There is no direct one-to-one scientific mapping from the gunas to neurotransmitters. Neurotransmitters work in complex networks, while the gunas are broad psychological and philosophical qualities. However, as a rough analogy:

Guna

Modern Neurotransmitter Analogy

Associated Traits

Sattva

Serotonin (and balanced neurotransmission overall)

Calmness, emotional stability, contentment, clarity

Rajas

Dopamine (and partly norepinephrine)

Motivation, reward-seeking, ambition, action, excitement

Tamas

GABA (sedation/inhibition) or states associated with reduced arousal

Rest, passivity, low energy, withdrawal

A more nuanced view is:

  • Sattva = balanced regulation of serotonin, dopamine, GABA, and other systems.
  • Rajas = relatively higher dopamine and norepinephrine activity.
  • Tamas = relatively lower arousal and motivation, often involving inhibitory processes and reduced activation.

So if you want the simplest modern comparison:

Satwik ≈ Serotonin
Rajasik ≈ Dopamine
Tamasik ≈ GABA

But this should be understood as an analogy rather than an established neuroscientific equivalence.


Get bitter or get better

 

You either get bitter or you get better. It’s that simple. You either take what has been dealt to you and allow it to make you a better person, or you allow it to tear you down. The choice does not belong to fate, it belongs to you.” 

~ Josh Shipp

SB 3.1

 Śrīmad Bhāgavatam (SB) 5.1 — The Activities of Mahārāja Priyavrata

This chapter begins Canto 5 and focuses on Mahārāja Priyavrata, a great devotee who initially preferred a life of spiritual contemplation but later accepted the responsibility of ruling the world on the order of Lord Brahmā. The chapter explores how a devotee can perform worldly duties without losing spiritual consciousness. 

Main themes

  1. Parīkṣit’s Question
    • King Parīkṣit wonders how Priyavrata, an ātmārāma (self-realized devotee), could become involved in household and royal life, which generally leads to material bondage. 
  2. Brahmā’s Instruction
    • Priyavrata had been practicing spiritual life under the guidance of Nārada Muni and was reluctant to rule.
    • Lord Brahmā personally instructed him to accept kingship as a service to the Supreme Lord and for the welfare of the world. 
  3. Rule Without Attachment
    • Priyavrata accepted the throne, married, and governed the universe effectively.
    • Although externally engaged in material duties, he remained spiritually conscious. This illustrates that devotional service is not destroyed by responsible action performed in obedience to divine will. 
  4. The Seven Oceans and Islands
    • A famous episode describes Priyavrata following the sun in his chariot to illuminate the dark side of the earth.
    • The tracks of his chariot became the seven oceans, dividing Bhū-maṇḍala into seven islands (dvīpas). 
  5. Renunciation
    • After a long and glorious reign, Priyavrata realized the temporary nature of worldly enjoyment.
    • He divided his kingdom among his sons, renounced his opulence, and returned to the path of spiritual realization and devotion. 

Key Lesson

SB 5.1 teaches that spiritual perfection does not depend merely on external renunciation. One may perform family, social, or governmental duties while remaining devoted to God. The essential principle is acting according to the Lord’s will without attachment to material enjoyment. Priyavrata’s life demonstrates both engagement in duty and ultimate detachment. 

Notable Verse (5.1.1)

Parīkṣit asks:

“Why did King Priyavrata, a self-realized devotee of the Lord, remain in household life, which is the root cause of karmic bondage and the defeat of human life’s mission?” 

This question sets the stage for the entire chapter and its teaching on devotion amidst worldly responsibilities.


And I was some of the mud that got to sit up and look around. Lucky me, lucky mud. Kurt Vonnegut

Sunday, 4 October 2026

You can’t make everyone happy. You are not a pizza.” ~ Author Unknown

Your strategy for living in the present will go a lot better when you accept how frequently the present sucks. Daron Larson

 Daron Larson’s line is a deceptively deep idea:

“Your strategy for living in the present will go a lot better when you accept how frequently the present sucks.”

Deep-dive points

  1. Being present does not mean enjoying the present.
    A common misunderstanding of mindfulness is: “If I’m present, I should feel peaceful, grateful, or happy.”
    But presence simply means being willing to experience what is actually happening—including boredom, frustration, loneliness, uncertainty, embarrassment, pain, or disappointment.
  2. The present is often ordinary, inconvenient, or unpleasant.
    We can romanticize “living in the moment” as sunsets, good meals, vacations, and meaningful conversations. But most moments are much less cinematic: waiting, commuting, doing chores, answering emails, sitting in traffic, feeling tired.
    If your philosophy requires the present to be enjoyable, you’ll constantly resist reality.
  3. Much of our suffering comes from arguing with the moment.
    There is a difference between:
    • “This is unpleasant.”
    • “This shouldn’t be happening.”
    • “I shouldn’t feel this way.”
    • “My life shouldn’t be like this.”
  4. The first is an observation. The others add layers of resistance.
  5. Acceptance isn’t approval.
    Accepting that something sucks doesn’t mean deciding that it is good.
    You can think: “I really don’t like this, but this is what is happening right now.”
    That distinction is powerful because acceptance allows you to respond intelligently rather than spending your energy wishing reality were different.
  6. The mind often escapes an unpleasant present through the past or future.
    When the present hurts, the mind naturally says:
    • “I wish I had…” → past
    • “If only…” → counterfactual past
    • “When X happens, I’ll finally…” → future
    • “What if…” → imagined future
  7. Sometimes reflection and planning are useful. But sometimes they’re simply sophisticated forms of not being where you actually are.
  8. The paradox: accepting unpleasantness can make the moment less unpleasant.
    Imagine you’re lying awake at 2 a.m.
    One layer is: “I’m awake.”
    Another is: “This is terrible. I need to sleep. Tomorrow will be awful. Why does this always happen?”
    The second layer may create more distress than the original problem. Acceptance removes some of the struggle:

    “I’m awake. I don’t like it. Let’s see what this moment is actually like.”
  9. Presence becomes more sustainable when it doesn’t require positive emotion.
    If “being present” means feeling good, you’ll abandon it whenever life gets difficult.
    If it means being available to whatever is happening, it becomes much more robust.
  10. There is an important difference between pain and resistance.
    Pain can be unavoidable. Resistance is often optional.
    For example:
    Pain: “I miss this person.”
    Resistance: “I shouldn’t still miss them.”
    Pain: “I’m nervous about this conversation.”
    Resistance: “I need to stop being nervous before I can have it.”
    Pain: “Today has been awful.”
    Resistance: “Today being awful means something is wrong with my life.”
  11. The quote also challenges the productivity version of mindfulness.
    We can turn “living in the present” into another self-improvement project:
    “I need to meditate better, stop overthinking, appreciate every moment, stay grateful…”
    Ironically, this can become another way of rejecting the current experience.
    Sometimes living in the present means simply:
    “I’m irritated right now.” And not immediately trying to fix your irritation.
  12. The deeper skill is becoming less conditional about being alive.
    There’s a subtle bargain many of us make:
    “I’ll be okay when…”
    • I have more money.
    • I find the right relationship.
    • My health improves.
    • Work becomes easier.
    • I become more confident.
    • I finally figure myself out.
  13. Larson’s point undermines that bargain. Life will continue producing moments that don’t fit the conditions you’ve set for being okay.

The practical takeaway

A more realistic definition of living in the present might be:

Stop requiring the present to be good before you’re willing to inhabit it.

When a moment is pleasant, enjoy it.
When it’s neutral, notice it.
When it’s painful, acknowledge it.
When something needs changing, change it.

But you don’t have to first convince yourself that the moment is wonderful.

Presence isn’t saying, “This moment is great.”
It’s saying, “This is the moment I’ve got—and I’m willing to actually be here for it.”