//////////////////////SILENCE, RAGE, HOPE AND LOSS
//////////////////////////////RAPAPORT RULES=GOOD THINGS FIRDT, THEN CRITICISE
//////////////////////////////WBM=By God, I mean a transcendental Something (being, force, ground, mystery, question mark) that is outside the frame of materiality; materiality includes matter and energy since E=mc2, plus dark matter/energy, plus other wild stuff that scientists will discover in the future. God is generally described in two major ways: as an omniscient and omnipotent being “who knows when a sparrow falls,” or as a kind of Ground from and as which everything arises – with many variations on these two view, plus syntheses and divergences.
///////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////RAPAPORT RULES=GOOD THINGS FIRDT, THEN CRITICISE
//////////////////////////////WBM=By God, I mean a transcendental Something (being, force, ground, mystery, question mark) that is outside the frame of materiality; materiality includes matter and energy since E=mc2, plus dark matter/energy, plus other wild stuff that scientists will discover in the future. God is generally described in two major ways: as an omniscient and omnipotent being “who knows when a sparrow falls,” or as a kind of Ground from and as which everything arises – with many variations on these two view, plus syntheses and divergences.
///////////////////////////////////
Rapoport.
How to compose a successful critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express
your target's position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target
says: "Thanks, I wish I'd thought of putting it that way."
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
- See more at:
http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2013/05/daniel-dennetts-seven-tools-for-thinking.html#sthash.pjcCqvTS.dpuf
Rapoport.
How to compose a successful critical commentary:
1. Attempt to re-express
your target's position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target
says: "Thanks, I wish I'd thought of putting it that way."
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.
- See more at:
http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2013/05/daniel-dennetts-seven-tools-for-thinking.html#sthash.pjcCqvTS.dpuf
Attractiveness
biases have been demonstrated in such different areas as teacher
judgments of students, voter preferences for political candidates and
jury judgments in simulated trials … attractiveness also influences
interviewers’ judgments of job applicants. - See more at:
http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2014/02/we-all-know-our-culture-puts-a-premium-on-good-looks-does-that-mean-that-the-ugly-are-oppressed.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+3quarksdaily+%283quarksdaily%29#sthash.dVsg1COh.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment