A
Peto’s Paradox is the observation that larger animals, which have more cells and longer lifespans, do not have a higher incidence of cancer than smaller animals. This contradicts the expectation that more cells and more cell divisions should lead to a higher likelihood of cancerous mutations.
For example:
-
Mice have a much higher cancer rate than whales, even though whales have vastly more cells.
-
Humans and elephants have similar cancer rates, even though elephants have far more cells and live longer.
Possible Explanations:
-
Better Tumor Suppression Genes: Elephants, for instance, have extra copies of the TP53 gene, which helps prevent cancer.
-
Stronger DNA Repair Mechanisms: Larger animals may have evolved more robust DNA repair systems.
-
Lower Metabolic Rates: Larger animals often have slower metabolisms, which may reduce mutation rates.
-
Cellular Senescence and Growth Control: Their cells might be programmed to divide less or undergo apoptosis (self-destruction) more readily if damage is detected.
Peto’s Paradox highlights the complexity of cancer biology and suggests that nature has evolved protective mechanisms that could inspire cancer prevention strategies in humans.
No comments:
Post a Comment