Upanishad contains an injunction; he does
not reject citta-vrtti-nirodha
itself. This is made clear when he says that in fact, the only way to achieve
a cessation to various mental transformations is through the steady
recollection of Self-knowledge. In other words, it is not as if practising yoga
(separately from studying Vedanta) to achieve citta-vrtti-nirodha will lead to
Self-knowledge and thereby to liberation. Rather, it is Self-knowledge,
obtained through Vedanta, and its recollection that directly leads to what the
yoga school describes as its goal, namely
citta-vrtti-nirodha
. Shankara’s
rejection of this as an injunction is extremely strong because
Self-knowledge
is not an action that can be enjoined
. He explains that Self-knowledge itself
leads to
citta-vrtti-nirodha
. If proper knowledge has already arisen, why is
there any further discussion of steadily recollecting this knowledge and of
citta-vrtti-nirodha
? The answer given is that the tendency to maintain that
knowledge may not be strong even after it arises. The tendency of speech,
mind and body to keep indulging in action may be strong because of the
prior momentum. To counter this, the Sruti teaches the recollection of Self-
knowledge as a
niyama
, accompanied by other means such as renunciation
and dispassion. Shankara makes clear that he views the Upanishad as
teaching a restrictive injunction (
niyama vidhi
), but not a primary injunction
(
apurva
vidhi
). (In
Brhadaranyaka Upanishad bhasya
and
Chandogya
Upanishad bhasya
.) Once known, the knowledge is to be consolidated and
steadily recollected, and this is the only means to
citta-vrtti-nirodha
. It also
counters the momentum of past karma. This discussion incorporates aspects
of both yoga and purva mimamsa. The key message is that
atma-jnana
cannot be enjoined because it is the way out of action. Action leads to
causation and cannot lead out of it. Nor can citta-vrtti-nirodha be enjoined
because it is not by itself the means to liberation. The steady recollection of
atma-jnana
can be taken as being enjoined in an ancillary fashion (niyama
vidhi) in order to check the tendency towards more action generated by the
momentum of
prarabdha karma
No comments:
Post a Comment