Astrology is widely regarded as a pseudoscience because it lacks empirical support and does not adhere to the scientific method. Below is a table summarizing key aspects of astrology’s scientific accuracy:
Aspect |
Scientific Evaluation |
Mechanism |
No known physical forces link celestial bodies to human traits or events. |
Empirical Evidence |
Studies show astrological predictions perform no better than chance. |
Reproducibility |
Different astrologers provide inconsistent predictions. |
Falsifiability |
Claims are vague and not testable in a controlled setting. |
Confirmation Bias |
People remember correct predictions but ignore incorrect ones. |
Psychological Factors |
The Barnum effect explains why vague statements feel personally relevant. |
Would you like details on specific studies or critiques of astrology?
No comments:
Post a Comment