A
Here’s a bullet-gist summary of the key ideas from When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows… by Steven Pinker (focusing on common knowledge and social coordination):
📘 Core Concept
-
Common knowledge: Not just that everyone knows something, but everyone knows that everyone knows it, recursively.
-
This recursive awareness is essential for coordination, social norms, and collective action.
🔑 Key Insights
-
Enables social coordination: Helps individuals align behavior in everyday life, politics, and economics.
-
Influences social dynamics: Shapes rituals, conventions, public announcements, and tipping points in society.
-
Foundation for trust: Reliable communication and shared understanding are critical for establishing common knowledge.
-
Amplifies consequences: Misunderstandings or false assumptions about what others know can lead to conflict, inefficiency, or social failure.
-
Applications: Explains phenomena like financial market bubbles, political revolutions, and viral trends, where perception of what everyone knows drives action.
If you want, I can make an even shorter 3–5 bullet “ultra-condensed” version perfect for quick revision or presentations. Do you want me to do that?
A
Here are some top quotes from Steven Pinker related to When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows… and the concept of common knowledge:
🧠 On Common Knowledge
-
“Common knowledge is not merely what everyone knows, but what everyone knows that everyone else knows.”
-
“Recursive awareness transforms private knowledge into public coordination.”
-
“Much of social life depends not on what people know, but on what they know that others know.”
🌍 On Society and Cooperation
-
“Trust and communication are the invisible infrastructure that allows societies to function.”
-
“Many of our collective behaviors, from tipping to revolutions, hinge on the perception of what everyone else knows.”
💬 On Human Behavior
-
“Human beings act not just on facts, but on beliefs about the beliefs of others.”
-
“The power of common knowledge lies in its ability to create self-fulfilling expectations.”
If you want, I can compile a longer list of 15–20 Pinker quotes from this book for use in talks, presentations, or study notes. Do you want me to do that?
A
EG
Here are three examples of recursive awareness (common knowledge):
-
Financial Markets – Stock Sell-Offs
-
Investors don’t just know a company is struggling; they know that other investors know it, which can trigger a massive sell-off.
-
The panic spreads because everyone acts based on what they believe everyone else believes.
-
-
Traffic Etiquette – Four-Way Stop
-
At a four-way stop, each driver knows the rule, but recursive awareness ensures smooth flow: each driver knows that others know the rule and will wait their turn.
-
Coordination depends on everyone knowing that everyone else knows how to behave.
-
-
Political Protests / Revolutions
-
A protest succeeds when enough people know the government is unpopular and also know that others know it.
-
Recursive awareness creates a tipping point where collective action becomes safe and likely.
-
If you want, I can give 5–7 more real-world examples spanning economics, politics, and social behavior that show recursive awareness in action. Do you want me to do that?
A
Here is a bullet-point gist of the passage:
The Central Problem (Game Theory): The piece examines the role of common knowledge in coordinating simple behaviors, using the example of Alice and Bob meeting for lunch (a "stag hunt" game). They will be happiest meeting at the café, but risk being happiest staying home if the other doesn't show up.
The Need for Common Knowledge: For seamless coordination, Alice and Bob need to know not only that the other prefers the café, but that they know that they know, and so on (iterated knowledge). Lack of common knowledge threatens simple, commonplace coordinated behaviors.
Pinker's Conclusion: The author uses this scenario to support the conclusion (attributed to Pinker) that common knowledge is necessary for basic, coordinated human behavior, as coordinated behavior is widespread.
The Philosophical Challenge: The book is criticized for ignoring a fundamental challenge to the prevalence of common knowledge: philosophical arguments (by Williamson and Lederman) suggest that individuals cannot possess infinitely iterated knowledge (knowing that you know that you know...), making true common knowledge humanly unattainable.
Rebuttal of Infinite Knowledge: The author attempts to rebut the thesis that true common knowledge is required for coordination. In the scenario, if Alice and Bob are at $60^{\circ}$ (each knows that the other will show up), they will surely meet.
Definition of "Sufficient" Knowledge: The article concludes that the requisite knowledge for coordination is not "common knowledge" (infinite layers of knowledge) but simply the knowledge at $60^{\circ}$ (each knows the other will show up), which only seems mysterious if one demands an explanation rooted in complex recursive thinking.
No comments:
Post a Comment