A
Here’s the TL;DR background of the Pediatric Emergency Care study “Characteristics Among a Pediatric Cohort Arriving Via EMS Following Nonaccidental and Accidental Trauma”:
TL;DR – Pediatric Trauma via EMS: Accidental vs Nonaccidental
Study purpose:
Researchers analysed children aged 5 and under who were brought to a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center by emergency medical services (EMS) between 2016–2018 to compare those injured by nonaccidental trauma (NAT) (e.g., child abuse) with those injured accidentally. (Lippincott Journals)
Key findings:
Out of 352 injured children, about 8.5 % were found to have injuries from nonaccidental trauma. (PubMed)
Children injured by NAT tended to be younger than those with accidental injuries. (PubMed)
Those in the NAT group were more likely to require higher levels of care (e.g., hospital admission) than the accidental injury group. (PubMed)
EMS scene times longer than 15 minutes were more common for the NAT group, possibly reflecting complexities in assessment or injury severity. (PubMed)
In a subgroup with head injuries, about 9 % were linked to NAT, with similar patterns in age and EMS scene times. (PubMed)
Bottom line:
A notable portion of young children arriving by EMS for trauma are victims of nonaccidental injuries, and these cases often involve younger age, higher care needs, and longer EMS scene times compared with accidental injuries — insights that could help EMS and hospital teams better recognise and respond to possible child abuse. (PubMed)
If you’d like, I can also provide a simple visual comparison chart of NAT vs accidental trauma characteristics from the study.
No comments:
Post a Comment