Great — you’re asking about Bernardo Kastrup’s use of “noumenal” vs. “phenomenal”. This is central to his Analytic Idealism framework. Let’s lay it out clearly:
🔹 Kantian Roots
- Phenomenal (from Kant) = the world as it appears to us through perception, categories of the mind, space, and time.
- Noumenal = the world as it is in itself, independent of our perception.
Kant argued we can never know the noumenon directly — only phenomena.
🔹 Kastrup’s Twist
Kastrup keeps the phenomenal/noumenal distinction, but reframes it under Idealism (everything is ultimately mental):
- Phenomenal (appearances)
- What consciousness presents in experience: sensations, thoughts, perceptions.
- Our inner experience (what it is like to be us) is phenomenal.
- The external world we perceive is also phenomenal — appearances in mind.
- Noumenal (the thing-in-itself)
- For Kastrup, the noumenal is not a material substrate (as materialists think).
- Instead, the noumenal is consciousness itself (the one universal Mind).
- Individual minds are dissociated alters of this broader noumenal consciousness.
🔹 Example
- When you see a tree:
- The phenomenal = the experience of green, texture, the concept “tree.”
- The noumenal = the underlying consciousness-in-itself expressing itself through the pattern we call “tree.”
🔹 Where Kastrup Differentiates
- Materialism: Phenomenal = mind, Noumenal = matter.
- Kant: Phenomenal = appearances, Noumenal = unknowable.
- Kastrup (Idealism): Phenomenal = appearances within consciousness, Noumenal = consciousness itself (the ground of being).
So for Kastrup:
- Phenomena = experiences.
- Noumenon = the experiencer / universal consciousness.
🔹 A Key Passage (paraphrased)
Kastrup often writes something like:
“The noumenal is not beyond consciousness, but rather consciousness itself in its pure, unconditioned form. The phenomenal is the way this consciousness presents itself to itself, under self-reflective dissociation.”
✅ In short:
For Kastrup, phenomenal reality = appearances in mind; noumenal reality = mind itself, the ground of all appearances.
Would you like me to also show how this maps onto Vedanta’s categories (phenomenal = Maya/Nama-Rupa, noumenal = Brahman) so you can see the East–West resonance?
No comments:
Post a Comment