a
Here’s a summary table of the TIME article: “The Sunk Cost Fallacy Is Ruining Your Decisions. Here’s How” by Jamie Ducharme:
| Section | Summary |
|---|---|
| Definition | The sunk cost fallacy is the tendency to continue an endeavor based on previously invested resources (money, time, effort), even when it's irrational. |
| Expert Insight | Christopher Olivola (Carnegie Mellon) explains that people continue with things that make them worse off, just to avoid wasting their past investment. |
| Common Examples | - Wearing expensive but unwanted clothes- Going to events you dread because tickets were paid for- Staying in unhappy relationships |
| Psychological Drivers | - Cognitive dissonance: discomfort from not following through- Regret aversion- Desire to appear not wasteful to self and others |
| Impact of Others’ Investments | People also honor other people’s sunk costs (e.g., going to a concert because a coworker gave you the ticket) |
| Key Experiment – Travel | People preferred a more expensive trip (even if they liked the cheaper one more), just because it cost more—regardless of who paid. |
| Key Experiment – Cake | Participants were more likely to keep eating expensive cake despite being full, regardless of who bought it. |
| Takeaway Quote | “What’s done is done... You’re just digging a deeper hole.” – Christopher Olivola |
| Main Advice | Learn to let go of past investments. Don’t let lost costs trap you into bad decisions. Focus on present value and future benefit instead. |
Would you like a printable version of this or tips on how to avoid the sunk cost trap in everyday life?
No comments:
Post a Comment