Monday, 24 November 2025

N CAFFEINE X NICU

 N

Here is a concise bullet-point gist of the review:


BULLET GIST

Rationale

  • Caffeine is widely used in preterm infants to support breathing.

  • Optimal timing and indications for starting caffeine remain uncertain.

Objectives

  • Compare benefits and harms of different strategies for initiating caffeine in preterm infants.

Methods

  • Searched major databases and trial registries to April 2025.

  • Included RCTs (including cluster and quasi-RCTs) comparing different initiation timings/indications.

  • Outcomes: mortality, chronic lung disease (CLD), adverse events, respiratory and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

  • Risk of bias: Cochrane RoB 2.0.

  • Analysis: fixed-effect meta-analysis; GRADE certainty assessment.

Included Studies

  • 11 RCTs; 774 infants; GA 23–34 weeks; published 2014–2023.

  • Comparisons:

    • Caffeine within 2 hours vs 2–24 hours (3 RCTs)

    • Caffeine within 72 hours vs after 72 hours (3 RCTs)

    • Prophylactic caffeine (≤72 h, asymptomatic) vs treating symptomatic apnea (2 RCTs)

    • During mechanical ventilation vs at extubation (3 RCTs)

  • No trials compared minimal-symptom vs moderate-to-severe apnea initiation.

  • Seven ongoing studies.


Synthesis of Key Results

1. Caffeine ≤2 h vs 2–24 h

  • CLD: Very uncertain effect.

  • Duration of ventilation (DMV): Very uncertain.

  • Mortality & adverse events: Not reported.

  • Hospital stay & apnea: Not reported.

2. Caffeine ≤72 h vs after 72 h

  • Mortality: Very uncertain.

  • CLD: Likely reduced (moderate certainty).

  • Apnea: Likely reduced (moderate certainty).

  • DMV & hospital stay: Very uncertain.

  • Adverse events: Not reported.

3. Prophylactic ≤72 h vs treating only symptomatic infants

  • Mortality: Little to no difference (low certainty).

  • CLD: Likely reduced (moderate certainty).

  • Adverse events leading to cessation: Little/no difference (low certainty).

  • DMV, hospital stay: Very uncertain.

  • Apnea: Not reported.

4. Starting caffeine during mechanical ventilation vs at extubation

  • CLD: May be reduced (low certainty).

  • DMV: May be substantially reduced (low certainty).

  • Mortality: Very uncertain.

  • Adverse events, apnea, hospital stay: Not reported.

No studies reported intermittent hypoxemia.


Conclusions

  • Evidence for starting caffeine within the first 2 hours or first 72 hours is very uncertain for many major outcomes.

  • Starting ≤72 h may reduce CLD and apnea compared with starting after 72 h.

  • Prophylactic ≤72 h vs symptomatic treatment:

    • Similar mortality and adverse events.

    • Probably reduces CLD.

  • Initiating during mechanical ventilation may reduce CLD and shorten ventilation time, but mortality effects remain uncertain.

  • Ongoing trials may significantly influence future conclusions.


No comments: